AXIOM BOINC - SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS
Date: 2026-03-04 19:47 UTC
Sanitized results analyzed: 1805 files

KEY SCIENTIFIC FINDINGS

FINDING #1: pit_delay_inhibitor_resonance (CONFIRMED REPLICATION, 20 seeds, 7 hosts)

  Hypothesis: Delayed adaptive inhibitor control creates non-monotonic pit-depth resonance at intermediate flow pulse periods, amplified by heterogeneity.

  Method: The simulation evaluates fixed, pulse, and adaptive inhibitor policies across flow periods [24,72,216], delays [0,10,30], heterogeneity [0.05,0.22], and chloride scales [0.7,1.1], then summarizes resonance and policy contrasts.

  Results: n=33 new runs. resonance_mean = +0.069729 +/- 0.002598 (33/33 positive, Cohen's d=26.84). adaptive_minus_fixed_mean = -0.002526 +/- 0.000886 (33/33 negative, d=-2.85). Host-mean spans were 0.00789 and 0.00313 respectively.

  Conclusion: SUPPORTED - replication remains strongly direction-consistent across hosts.

---

FINDING #2: chemostat_delay_crossfeeding_resonance (PRELIMINARY, 24 seeds, 5 hosts)

  Hypothesis: Adaptive nutrient control with sensing delay exhibits period-dependent resonance that can reduce coexistence under intermediate forcing periods.

  Method: Two-species cross-feeding chemostat dynamics are simulated under fixed/pulse/adaptive inflow control over periods [18,54,162], delays [0,8,24], heterogeneity [0.04,0.18], and shock amplitudes [0.5,1.0], with coexistence/collapse summaries.

  Results: n=30 runs. adaptive_vs_pulse_coexistence = -0.003069 +/- 0.002968 (26/30 negative, d=-1.03, host-span=0.00254). resonance_strength = -0.000252 +/- 0.004656 (13/30 positive, d=-0.05, host-span=0.00688).

  Conclusion: INCONCLUSIVE - direction for adaptive_vs_pulse is mostly negative but practical magnitude is very small (<0.5 percentage points) and resonance metric shows no consistent effect.

---

FINDING #3: interdep_flow_memory_shedding_tradeoff (INCONCLUSIVE, 8 seeds, 2 hosts)

  Hypothesis: Intermediate memory windows improve interdependent-network survival relative to edge windows under delayed risk forecasts.

  Method: Coupled cascade simulations (n=384 nodes) sweep memory windows [1,3,8,16] and forecast bias [-0.15,0,+0.15] with adaptive shedding/recovery; summary reports medium-window gain.

  Results: n=9 runs. mean_medium_window_gain = -0.001049 +/- 0.001156 (4/9 positive, d=-0.91, host-span=0.00217).

  Conclusion: INCONCLUSIVE - N<10 and mixed signs; no reliable effect established.

EXPERIMENT STATUS
pit_delay_inhibitor_resonance | 33 new files | 20 seeds | confirmed replication support
chemostat_delay_crossfeeding_resonance | 30 new files | 24 seeds | preliminary weak negative direction
interdep_flow_memory_shedding_tradeoff | 9 new files | 8 seeds | insufficient data

NOTES
- 74 experiment families had >=5 new files in the 120-minute window; 71 remain unclaimed due to unresolved schema-to-metric alignment for named scientific comparisons.
- Claims were restricted to families with script-verified hypotheses/methods and unambiguous scalar mapping.