AXIOM BOINC — SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS
Date: 2026-03-04 19:10 UTC
Sanitized results analyzed: 1805 files

KEY SCIENTIFIC FINDINGS

FINDING #1: pit_delay_inhibitor_resonance (CONFIRMED REPLICATION, 33 runs, 20 seeds, 7 hosts)

  Hypothesis: Delayed adaptive inhibitor control creates non-monotonic pit-depth resonance at intermediate flow pulse periods, amplified by heterogeneity.

  Method: Corrosion pit simulations were run per trial under fixed/pulse/adaptive inhibitor policies across periods [24,72,216], delays [0,10,30], heterogeneity [0.05,0.22], and chloride [0.7,1.1], then summarized into resonance and policy-difference metrics.

  Results: resonance_mean = +0.069729 +/- 0.002598 (33/33 positive, Cohen's d=26.84); adaptive_minus_fixed_mean = -0.002526 +/- 0.000886 (33/33 negative, d=-2.85). Cross-host mean spread was small (0.00789 and 0.00313 respectively).

  Conclusion: SUPPORTED — this batch replicates the established resonance signal with consistent direction across all runs.

---

FINDING #2: chemostat_delay_crossfeeding_resonance (PRELIMINARY, 30 runs, 24 seeds, 5 hosts)

  Hypothesis: Adaptive nutrient control with sensing delay exhibits period-dependent resonance that can reduce coexistence under intermediate forcing periods.

  Method: Two-species cross-feeding chemostat simulations were run with fixed/pulse/adaptive inflow control over periods [18,54,162], delays [0,6,18], heterogeneity [0.04,0.18], and shock amplitudes [0.10,0.25], then reduced to coexistence and resonance summaries.

  Results: adaptive_vs_pulse_coexistence = -0.003069 +/- 0.002968 (26/30 negative, d=-1.03, host span 0.00254). resonance_strength = -0.000252 +/- 0.004656 (13/30 positive, d=-0.054), indicating no stable resonance-direction signal.

  Conclusion: PRELIMINARY — direction favors adaptive underperformance vs pulse, but practical magnitude is very small and resonance metric is inconsistent.

---

FINDING #3: interdep_flow_memory_shedding_tradeoff (INCONCLUSIVE, 9 runs, 8 seeds, 2 hosts)

  Hypothesis: Intermediate memory windows improve interdependent-network survival relative to edge windows under delayed risk forecasts.

  Method: Coupled cascade simulations (n=384 nodes) were run across memory windows [1,3,8,16] and forecast biases [-0.15,0,+0.15] with adaptive shedding/recovery; medium-window gain summarizes re-entrant benefit.

  Results: mean_medium_window_gain = -0.001049 +/- 0.001156 (4/9 positive, d=-0.91; host span 0.00217).

  Conclusion: INCONCLUSIVE — N<10 with mixed signs; no robust effect can be claimed this cycle.

EXPERIMENT STATUS
pit_delay_inhibitor_resonance | 33 files | 20 seeds | confirmed replication
chemostat_delay_crossfeeding_resonance | 30 files | 24 seeds | preliminary (small effect)
interdep_flow_memory_shedding_tradeoff | 9 files | 8 seeds | inconclusive (insufficient N)
other families (schema unresolved this window) | 1733 files | n/a | no scientific claim

NOTES
- Claims are restricted to numeric sanitized outputs with script-resolved scalar mapping.
- 71 families with >=5 files had unresolved schema alignment this cycle and were excluded from inference.
- No operational throughput/deployment metrics were used as scientific findings.