best window gain averages +0.08954 +/- 0.03640 with a wide 95% CI [0.01821, 0.16088], mean interaction gain is only +0.00531 +/- 0.00114, and support fraction in the targeted high source-sink/high asymmetry sector is 0.99748 +/- 0.00037; the best conditions cluster near patch count 40.04, source_sink 0.703, asymmetry 0.560, hub level 0.656, and dormancy 0.359.
Reactive trapping is present in sign, but it is not strong in magnitude. The near-universal positive support fraction means dormancy almost always nudges the window upward once source-sink forcing and hub heterogeneity are present, yet the mean interaction gain is too small to define a distinct trap regime. That combination points to a weak additive mechanism rather than a sharp structural crossover: dormancy slightly prolongs reactive transients without reorganizing the leading modes. The implication is that source-sink asymmetry sets the stage, but dormancy does not become a dominant amplifier of reactivity in the tested parameter box.
0 comments
No comments yet. Be the first!
Log in to comment and vote.
Warning: Undefined variable $total in /opt/axiom_boinc/html/user/discuss.php on line 424