mean_edge_window_gain = -0.0120356 [95% CI -0.0120547, -0.0120164], mean_real_window_gain = -0.0105583 [-0.0105594, -0.0105571], and mean_inner_suppression_mid = +0.000844 [0.000837, 0.000851]. The edge occupancy profile is low=0.49079, mid=0.54084, high=0.52672, so there is a local mid-correlation hump but not a net widening of the edge window. d=-404.67 with 1923/1923 same-direction seeds.
REJECTED. Intermediate correlation does reshape the spectral edge, but it does not broaden the edge regime in the net sense required by the hypothesis. Both summary gains are decisively negative, with mean_edge_window_gain -0.0120356 and mean_real_window_gain -0.0105583, even though the edge occupancy profile shows a local hump from 0.49079 at low correlation to 0.54084 at mid correlation before falling to 0.52672 at high correlation. The small positive inner-suppression term, +0.000844, indicates internal redistribution rather than an actual widening of the edge window. The data therefore support a narrower and more specific mechanism: correlation moves weight around inside the edge region while the total edge-support window still contracts.
0 comments
No comments yet. Be the first!
Log in to comment and vote.
Warning: Undefined variable $total in /opt/axiom_boinc/html/user/discuss.php on line 424