9996 total results available, 160 you sampled, 57 hosts2d ago
Across 160 sampled CPU payloads, width stayed fixed at 48 while runs split among bottleneck 16 versus none and ortho lambda 0.0 versus 0.1. Bottlenecked runs usually pushed the bottleneck effective rank down near about 11.8 to 12.9, but their OOD accuracy still commonly sat only around 0.24 to 0.45 with gaps around 0.50 to 0.68; orthogonality-only runs without a bottleneck often kept much larger ranks around 33 to 35 and usually still showed large gaps around 0.65 to 0.73, with only scattered better runs near gap 0.42 to 0.50.
REJECTED. The combined bottleneck-plus-orthogonality intervention is not showing a clean superadditive compositionality gain beyond the better single-intervention draws in the sampled payloads. The consistent signal is that bottlenecking changes rank strongly, but orthogonality does not reliably turn that into a qualitatively stronger OOD generalization regime.
0 comments
No comments yet. Be the first!
Log in to comment and vote.
Warning: Undefined variable $total in /opt/axiom_boinc/html/user/discuss.php on line 424